Partisipasi Warga dan Nilai Publik dalam Kebijakan Daerah: Studi Kota Bandung
Keywords:
Citizen Participation, Public Value, Local LolicyAbstract
Regional autonomy positions citizen participation as a key instrument for strengthening local democracy and creating public value–oriented policies. However, in practice, citizen participation often remains procedural and has limited influence on substantive policy decisions. This study aims to analyze the forms, quality, and contribution of citizen participation to public value creation in local policies in Bandung City. The study draws on theories of citizen participation, participatory governance, and public value. A qualitative case study approach was employed. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and document analysis, and analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings indicate that although participatory mechanisms are formally available, the quality of citizen participation remains largely symbolic and has limited impact on final policy decisions. While participation contributes to policy legitimacy, it has not yet optimally generated substantive public value. These findings highlight the need to strengthen deliberative and inclusive participatory governance to enhance public value creation in local policymaking.
Otonomi daerah menempatkan partisipasi warga sebagai instrumen penting dalam memperkuat demokrasi lokal dan menciptakan kebijakan daerah yang bernilai publik. Namun, dalam praktiknya, partisipasi warga sering kali masih bersifat prosedural dan belum memberikan pengaruh substantif terhadap pengambilan keputusan kebijakan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk, kualitas, dan kontribusi partisipasi warga terhadap penciptaan nilai publik dalam kebijakan daerah di Kota Bandung. Kajian ini menggunakan perspektif partisipasi warga, governance partisipatif, dan teori nilai publik. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi, dan studi dokumentasi, serta dianalisis menggunakan analisis tematik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun mekanisme partisipasi warga telah tersedia, kualitas partisipasi masih cenderung formalistik dan memiliki pengaruh terbatas terhadap keputusan akhir kebijakan. Partisipasi warga berkontribusi pada peningkatan legitimasi kebijakan, namun belum optimal dalam menciptakan nilai publik secara substantif. Temuan ini menegaskan pentingnya penguatan governance partisipatif yang lebih deliberatif dan inklusif di tingkat pemerintahan daerah.
References
Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (2021). Public governance as co-creation: A strategy for revitalizing the public sector and rejuvenating democracy. Cambridge University Press.
Nabatchi, T., & Leighninger, M. (2020). Public participation for 21st century democracy. Jossey-Bass.
Benington, J., & Moore, M. H. (2021). Public value: Theory and practice. Red Globe Press.
Bowen, G. A. (2020). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 20(2), 125–140.
Bozeman, B. (2020). Public values: Citizens’ perspective. Georgetown University Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2022). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the New Public Management. Public Administration Review, 82(2), 300–312.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2021). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Denhardt, J. V., Denhardt, R. B., & Aristigueta, M. P. (2023). Managing human behavior in public and nonprofit organizations (5th ed.). CQ Press.
Fung, A. (2020). The principle of affected interests: An interpretation and defense. Democracy Journal, 56, 45–58.
Guest, G., Namey, E., & Saldaña, J. (2024). Collecting and analyzing qualitative data at scale. SAGE Publications.
Moore, M. H., & Benington, J. (2021). Public value: Theory and practice. Red Globe Press.
OECD. (2020). Innovative citizen participation and new democratic institutions: Catching the deliberative wave. OECD Publishing.
Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2021). A new theory for public service management? Toward a (public) service-dominant approach. American Review of Public Administration, 51(2), 89–104.
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2020). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 47(1), 1–11.
Peters, B. G. (2021). Advanced introduction to public policy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Quick, K. S., & Bryson, J. M. (2022). Public participation. In G. T. Jennings & J. Hall (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management (pp. 1–23). Oxford University Press.
UNDP. (2022). People-centred governance: A framework for democratic participation. United Nations Development Programme.
Yin, R. K. (2023). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (7th ed.). SAGE Publications.
