Dinasti Politik dan Penempatan Birokrasi: Implikasi Terhadap Kinerja Pemerintahan di Indonesia
Keywords:
Political Dynasties, Bureaucracy, Governance PerformanceAbstract
Political dynasties in Indonesia have raised serious concerns in governance, particularly regarding the placement of human resources (HR) in bureaucratic positions based on loyalty and kinship rather than meritocracy. This issue is urgent as it directly affects government performance and accountability. The objective of this study is to analyze how bureaucratic placement within political dynasties influences governance quality in Indonesia. Theoretical frameworks include political patronage, bureaucratic meritocracy, and good governance. This research employs a qualitative case study method, using in-depth interviews, observation, and document analysis. The findings reveal that political dynasties reinforce patronage practices, undermine the merit system, and weaken transparency and public accountability. In conclusion, political dynasties negatively affect bureaucratic professionalism, thus requiring stricter regulations, term limits, and stronger independent oversight mechanisms.
Fenomena dinasti politik di Indonesia telah memunculkan persoalan serius dalam tata kelola pemerintahan, khususnya terkait penempatan sumber daya manusia (SDM) dalam birokrasi yang lebih didasarkan pada loyalitas dan kekerabatan daripada meritokrasi. Kondisi ini mendesak untuk dikaji karena berimplikasi langsung terhadap kinerja dan akuntabilitas pemerintahan. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis bagaimana praktik bureaucratic placement dalam struktur dinasti politik memengaruhi kualitas pemerintahan di Indonesia. Kajian teori yang digunakan meliputi patronase politik, meritokrasi birokrasi, dan good governance. Metode penelitian yang diterapkan adalah studi kasus kualitatif dengan teknik wawancara mendalam, observasi, dan analisis dokumen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dinasti politik cenderung memperkuat praktik patronase, mengabaikan merit system, dan melemahkan transparansi serta akuntabilitas publik. Kesimpulannya, politik dinasti berdampak negatif terhadap profesionalisme birokrasi, sehingga diperlukan regulasi, pembatasan masa jabatan, dan penguatan pengawasan independen.
References
Anggraini, D., & Riharjo, I. B. (2017). Dinasti politik dan penurunan kualitas tata kelola pemerintahan. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 21(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.24935
Asako, Y., Iida, T., Matsubayashi, T., & Ueda, M. (2015). Dynasties in democracies: The political consequences of dynastic legislators in Japan. American Political Science Review, 109(4), 760–782. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055415000382
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Buehler, M. (2013). Revisiting the inclusion–moderation thesis in the context of decentralized institutions: The behavior of Indonesia’s Prosperous Justice Party in national and local politics. Party Politics, 19(2), 210–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068812472572
Choi, E. J. (2018). Political dynasties and policy continuity: Evidence from South Korea. Asian Survey, 58(5), 833–856. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2018.58.5.833
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dal Bó, E., Dal Bó, P., & Snyder, J. (2009). Political dynasties. Review of Economic Studies, 76(1), 115–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00519.x
Darmansyah, D., Putra, R. E., & Hartati, S. (2020). Political dynasties and government performance in Indonesia: Evidence from audit opinion. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 35(2), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.55985
Farika, F., Yuliana, D., & Huda, N. (2023). Civic engagement and transparency in strengthening democratic governance in Indonesia. Journal of Governance, 8(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.31506/jog.v8i1.17253
George, S., & Ponattu, D. (2019). Dynastic politics in South Asia: Electoral advantage or democratic deficit? Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 4(3), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891118819184
Hidayat, S. (2021). Political dynasties and local governance in Indonesia: The challenge of bureaucratic reform. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 40(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034211002670
Hutcheson, D. S., & Semenova, E. (2019). Political recruitment and dynasties in Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, 71(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2018.1541204
IAKSS. (2024). Dinasti politik dan birokrasi Indonesia: Kajian akademik. Jakarta: Indonesian Association for Knowledge in Social Sciences. [Tanpa DOI – laporan kebijakan]
Kopecký, P., Scherlis, G., Panizza, F., & Spirova, M. (2016). Party patronage in contemporary democracies: Results from an expert survey in 22 countries. European Journal of Political Research, 55(1), 416–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12135
Mendoza, R. U., Beja, E. L., Venida, V. S., & Yap, D. B. (2012). Inequality in democracy: Insights from an empirical analysis of political dynasties in the 15th Philippine Congress. Philippine Political Science Journal, 33(2), 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/01154451.2012.734093
MKR Indonesia. (n.d.). Fenomena politik dinasti di Indonesia. Retrieved from https://mkrindonesia.org/politik-dinasti
Nevy Ramadhani, N. (2024). Masa jabatan, dinasti politik, dan demokrasi lokal di Indonesia. Jurnal Politik, 10(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.7454/jp.v10i1.765
Nigro, L. G., Nigro, F. A., & Kellough, J. E. (2014). The new public personnel administration (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Prianto, A. (2016). Kualitas kepemimpinan politik dalam demokrasi lokal: Kajian standar kompetensi calon kepala daerah. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 2(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.24905/jip.2.1.2016.87-101
Purwaningsih, T. (2015). Dinasti politik dalam demokrasi lokal: Studi kasus Pilkada. Jurnal Politik, 1(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.7454/jp.v1i2.22
Querubin, P. (2016). Family and politics: Dynastic persistence in the Philippines. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 11(2), 151–181. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00014161
Scott, J. C. (1972). Patron-client politics and political change in Southeast Asia. American Political Science Association. https://doi.org/10.2307/1956857
Sembiring, A., & Simanihuruk, T. (2018). Desentralisasi, identitas, dan politik lokal di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Politik dan Pemerintahan, 4(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.21009/jipp.041.04
Susanti, R. (2017). Demokrasi substantif dan tantangan politik dinasti di Indonesia. Jurnal Demokrasi dan Politik Lokal, 5(2), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.15294/jdp.v5i2.18753
Sutisna, A. (2017). Politik dinasti dan implikasinya terhadap pembangunan daerah. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 6(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.23887/jish-undiksha.v6i1.9467
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. University of California Press.
Winters, J. A. (2011). Oligarchy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139017887
World Bank. (1992). Governance and development. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/604951468739447676/governance-and-development
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
