Efektivitas Administrasi Lingkungan dalam Meningkatkan Ketahanan Wilayah Terhadap Bencana
Keywords:
Administrasi Lingkungan, Ketahanan Wilayah, Mitigasi Bencana, Manajemen Kebencanaan, Pembangunan BerkelanjutanAbstract
Environmental administration plays an important role in strengthening regional resilience against various disaster threats, both natural and human-induced. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of environmental administration in supporting disaster mitigation, preparedness, and post-disaster recovery efforts. The research employs a qualitative approach through literature review of policies, regulations, and environmental administrative practices related to disaster management. The findings indicate that environmental administration integrated with development planning, natural resource management, and community participation can significantly enhance regional resilience to disaster risks. However, several challenges remain, including weak inter-agency coordination, limited resources, and low public awareness of sustainable environmental management. Therefore, strengthening policies, improving institutional capacity, and fostering collaboration among government, communities, and the private sector are necessary to establish an effective and sustainable environmental administration system in disaster management.
Administrasi lingkungan memiliki peran penting dalam meningkatkan ketahanan wilayah terhadap berbagai ancaman bencana, baik yang disebabkan oleh faktor alam maupun aktivitas manusia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis efektivitas administrasi lingkungan dalam mendukung upaya mitigasi, kesiapsiagaan, dan pemulihan pascabencana. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kualitatif dengan studi literatur terhadap berbagai kebijakan, regulasi, dan praktik administrasi lingkungan yang berkaitan dengan penanggulangan bencana. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa administrasi lingkungan yang terintegrasi dengan perencanaan pembangunan, pengelolaan sumber daya alam, serta partisipasi masyarakat mampu meningkatkan ketahanan wilayah terhadap risiko bencana. Namun, masih terdapat tantangan seperti lemahnya koordinasi antarinstansi, keterbatasan sumber daya, serta kurangnya kesadaran masyarakat terhadap pengelolaan lingkungan berkelanjutan. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan penguatan kebijakan, peningkatan kapasitas kelembagaan, serta kolaborasi antara pemerintah, masyarakat, dan sektor swasta guna menciptakan sistem administrasi lingkungan yang efektif dan berkelanjutan dalam menghadapi bencana.
References
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.
Biermann, F., Abbott, K., Andresen, S., Bäckstrand, K., Bernstein, S., Betsill, M. M., … Young, O. R. (2012). Navigating the Anthropocene: Improving Earth system governance. Science, 335(6074), 1306–1307.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1217255
Bulkeley, H., Andonova, L. B., Betsill, M. M., Compagnon, D., Hale, T., Hoffmann, M. J., … VanDeveer, S. D. (2014). Transnational climate change governance. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107706033
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. California: Sage Publications.
Cutter, S. L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., & Webb, J. (2008). A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change, 18(4), 598–606.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013]
Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2003). Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jordan, A., & Lenschow, A. (2010). Environmental policy integration: A state of the art review. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20(3), 147–158.
https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.539
Meadowcroft, J. (2007). National sustainable development strategies: Features, challenges and reflexivity. European Environment, 17(3), 152–163.
https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.450
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. California: Sage Publications.
Republik Indonesia. (2007). Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanggulangan Bencana. Jakarta.
Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup. Jakarta.
Twigg, J. (2009). Characteristics of a disaster-resilient community: A guidance note. DFID Disaster Risk Reduction Interagency Coordination Group.
https://www.preventionweb.net/publication/characteristics-disaster-resilient-community
United Nations Environment Programme. (2019). Environmental rule of law: First global report. UNEP.
https://www.unep.org/resources/report/environmental-rule-law-first-global-report
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2019). Global Environment Outlook – GEO-6: Healthy Planet, Healthy People. Nairobi: UNEP.
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR). (2015). Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. Geneva: United Nations.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Panengen: Journal of Indigenous Knowledge

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
