Menilai Ulang Kualitas Pelayanan Publik: Bukti dari Kecamatan Andir

Authors

  • Bagus Dwiki Hermawan Universitas Al Ghifari Author

Keywords:

Keywords: Public service, service quality, Andir District

Abstract

Public service is a key indicator of modern bureaucratic performance, yet many regions still struggle with regulatory gaps, limited bureaucratic capacity, and low community participation. This study aims to reassess the quality of public services in Andir District, Bandung, by focusing on infrastructure, bureaucratic competence, and the alignment of policies with citizens’ needs. Drawing upon service quality theory, classical public administration, and customer satisfaction theory, this research employed a qualitative descriptive approach using interviews, observations, and document analysis. Findings reveal that although physical facilities are relatively adequate, limited technological skills among staff and the lack of effective policy dissemination remain major obstacles. Interestingly, service quality is shaped not only by bureaucrats’ responsiveness but also by citizens’ readiness and administrative literacy. These insights highlight the need for integrated reforms that combine regulatory updates, capacity building of civil servants, and more participatory communication between government and the public.

Pelayanan publik merupakan indikator utama keberhasilan birokrasi modern, namun di banyak daerah masih menghadapi kendala regulasi, kapasitas aparatur, dan rendahnya partisipasi masyarakat. Penelitian ini bertujuan menilai ulang kualitas pelayanan publik di Kecamatan Andir, Bandung, dengan menekankan dimensi infrastruktur, kompetensi aparatur, dan relevansi kebijakan terhadap kebutuhan masyarakat. Mengacu pada teori kualitas pelayanan, administrasi publik klasik, dan kepuasan masyarakat, penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif melalui wawancara, observasi, serta dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun fasilitas fisik relatif memadai, keterbatasan penguasaan teknologi aparatur dan minimnya sosialisasi kebijakan masih menjadi penghambat signifikan. Menariknya, kualitas layanan tidak hanya ditentukan oleh aparatur, tetapi juga kesiapan dan literasi administratif masyarakat. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa perbaikan pelayanan publik menuntut strategi terpadu: pembaruan regulasi, penguatan kapasitas SDM, serta komunikasi birokrasi yang lebih partisipatif.

References

Ballart, X., et al. (2024). Enhancing satisfaction with public services: The effect of physical service elements. Public Services Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2024.2317835

Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering (4th ed.). Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/The-New-Public-Service-Serving-Not-Steering/Denhardt-Denhardt/p/book/9781138891258

Dwiyanto, A. (2018). Membangun Sistem Pelayanan Publik yang Memihak pada Rakyat. Jurnal Populasi, 26(1), 1–18. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/populasi/article/view/11830

Ferreira, D. C., et al. (2023). Patient satisfaction with healthcare services and the physical environment as a determinant. PMC. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10001171/

Indriastuti, I. (2020). Memahami Kembali Pelayanan Publik untuk Mewujudkan Tata Pemerintahan yang Baik (Good Governance). Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik, 10(1). https://jurnal.uwp.ac.id/fisip/index.php/GovernanceJKMP/article/view/76

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing Management (edic. terbaru). Pearson. Pearson.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Retrieved from https://www.metodos.work/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Qualitative-Data-Analysis.pdf

Moleong, L. J. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. Retrieved from https://etheses.iainkediri.ac.id/12840/3/933516119_bab3.pdf

Osborne, S. P. (2010). The New Public Governance? Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861684

Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis - Into the Age of Austerity (4th ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198795179.001.0001

Rakauskiene, M. B., et al. (2023). Measuring Quality Perception of Public Services. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 15(2), 65–76. https://sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/emj-2023-0015

Rahmatullah, R., et al. (2025). A Study of User Satisfaction and Trust in Local Governments in Indonesia. Public Organization Review. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43621-025-01645-4

Sinambela, L. P. (2006). Reformasi Pelayanan Publik: Teori, Kebijakan, dan Implementasi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=103950&lokasi=lokal

Sitorus, N. Z., Anggi, O., Indri, K., Saragih, J. P., Simanjuntak, M. K., Sentosa, Y. P. N., & Ivanna, J. (2024). Sarana dan Prasarana Pelayanan Publik di Indonesia. Journal of Law & Policy Review, 2(2), 171–177. https://journal.mahesacenter.org/index.php/jlpr/article/download/107/pdf

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. Retrieved from https://repository.unpas.ac.id/11430/26/12.%20BAB%20III.pdf

Syafiie, I. K. (2006). Ilmu Administrasi Publik (Cetakan ke-2). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Diambil dari Perpustakaan IPDN. https://inlislite.ipdn.ac.id/opac/detail-opac?id=9720

Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Berry, L. L. (1990). Delivering Quality Service: Balancing Customer Perceptions and Expectations. Free Press. Colorado Mountain College.

Downloads

Published

02-09-2025

How to Cite

Menilai Ulang Kualitas Pelayanan Publik: Bukti dari Kecamatan Andir. (2025). Panengen: Journal of Indigenous Knowledge, 4(1), 11-19. https://jurnal.panengeninsani.com/index.php/pjoik/article/view/56

Similar Articles

31-37 of 37

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.